Bedside Snapshot

Use It When
Any child whose injury does not fit the history or development, any child under 4 years with bruising, and any infant with a minor injury. Screen, then escalate.
Key Numbers
< 4 years with bruising: apply TEN-4-FACESp
≤ 4.99 months: any bruise is positive
Validation: 95.6% sensitive, 87.1% specific
Sentinel visits: 0.7% later serious abuse injury overall; 8.3% after index abuse dx
Formulas
None. TEN-4-FACESp is a checklist of body sites and features, not a calculation.
Action Thresholds
  • Any positive element: hands-on examination and child protection escalation per protocol
  • Injury not fitting history: treat as concerning until explained
  • Neurologic change, unexplained injury: ABCDE now
Watch Out
A positive screen is not a diagnosis, and a plausible history does not clear a positive element. Examine, record the words, report per state law. Do not confront the caregiver.

Overview & Pediatric Differences

Child maltreatment, including abusive injury, is often recognized late. The child cannot tell you what happened. The explanation comes from the people who may be responsible. Your job here is narrow. Spot the injuries that do not fit the history, use the validated screening rules, protect the child and report as state law requires. Deciding who caused it is not your call. This page covers physical injury in young children: bruising, sentinel injuries, abusive head trauma and fractures. Burns, abdominal or thoracic injury, sexual abuse and neglect are not covered in detail.

Bruising is the central warning sign in young children. The authors of the study that refined the bruising decision rule describe bruising from physical abuse as the most common earlier injury to be missed or misdiagnosed before an abuse-related fatality or near-fatality in a young child.

Why Kids Are Different

  • No reliable history: Preverbal infants and young children cannot give their own account. The caregiver's explanation has to be tested against the injury itself.
  • Minor injuries can be the first sign: "Sentinel" injuries such as bruises and frenulum injuries can come before serious abuse. A small injury is a reason to look further.
  • Injuries can be hidden: Bruises may sit under clothing or hair. A complete skin exam is part of the assessment.
  • Development limits the mechanism: A non-mobile infant cannot produce some injuries by falling. Mobility has to be checked against the history.

Recent U.S. data show how big the screening problem is. Of 23,919 children aged 0 to 24 months who had an emergency department sentinel-injury visit (2014 to 2019), 1,156 (4.8%) were diagnosed with abuse at that index visit. The same authors warn that widespread screening can harm children and families. A structured tool matters for exactly that reason.

Screen, do not diagnose: The tools here sort risk for evaluation. A positive screen means a hands-on exam and escalation per protocol. It is not a finding of abuse.

How to Use

  1. Treat life threats first: ABCDE. Recognition and documentation follow stabilisation.
  2. Check the injury against the child: does the child's age and mobility fit the injury (can an infant that does not yet roll or sit have made this mark)?
  3. Record the history word for word: who gave it, when it was given, how the injury happened, and when care was sought. Do not paraphrase or add conclusions.
  4. Examine the whole skin: undress the child, look at the head, ears, neck, mouth, torso and buttocks, and document each bruise by site, size, colour and shape.
  5. Apply the bruising rule: run every bruise through the TEN-4-FACESp elements in the table below. Any positive element is a positive screen.
  6. Look for other injuries and signs: fractures, oral or frenulum injury and neurologic change. Ask for the child protection team and follow local protocol.
  7. Protect and report: keep the child safe, do not confront the caregiver, and report under state law. See Prehospital & Transport Considerations.
Worked example: Picture a 3-month-old who cannot roll yet, with a bruise on one ear. The story is a fall from a couch. At 4.99 months or younger, every bruise counts, and an ear bruise counts on top of that. That makes this a positive screen. Write the history down as it was given, look at the whole skin, and escalate per protocol. Whether the fall happened is not yours to settle here.

Bruising Decision Rule (TEN-4-FACESp)

TEN-4-FACESp is a bruising clinical decision rule. It was tested in children younger than 4 years with bruising, at five urban U.S. pediatric emergency departments. Only children with bruising get it applied. One positive element flags the child as at risk of abuse, for screening only. The validation cohort had 2,123 children with consensus classification. Sensitivity was 95.6% (95% CI 93.0% to 97.3%) and specificity 87.1% (95% CI 85.4% to 88.6%). At the cohort's abuse prevalence of 19%, positive predictive value was 63.9% and negative predictive value 98.8%. Prevalence moves those predictive values, so expect them to shift in other settings, such as prehospital care or triage.

TEN-4-FACESp bruising clinical decision rule
ElementBody Site or FeatureRule Criterion
T
Torso (chest, abdomen, back, buttocks, genitourinary area)
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
E
Ear
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
N
Neck
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
4
Any site in an infant
Bruise in an infant 4.99 months or younger
F
Frenulum
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
A
Angle of jaw
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
C
Cheeks (fleshy part)
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
E
Eyelids
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
S
Subconjunctivae
Bruise in a child younger than 4 years
p
Patterned bruise (bite, loop, hand slap, squeeze, grab or multilinear)
Any age in the rule population
A positive rule is not a diagnosis: In this cohort, about one positive in three was not abuse. So a positive means a full evaluation, never an accusation. No bruise, no rule. Nothing replaces clinical judgment.

Injury Patterns to Recognize

Injury or SignWhy It MattersAction
Sentinel injury (minor injury in an infant 0 to 24 months)
Minor injuries can precede serious abusive injury. In the cohort, 0.7% of children with a sentinel-injury ED visit had a serious abusive injury within 12 months, and 8.3% of those with abuse diagnosed at the index visit had one.
Look for other injuries, run the bruising rule, and follow the child protection pathway.
Patterned bruise (bite, loop, hand slap, squeeze, grab)
A pattern that suggests an instrument or a grip is a positive element at any age in the rule population.
Document shape and size; escalate per protocol.
Frenulum or oral injury
A frenulum or oral bruise is a positive element for a child younger than 4 years.
Examine the mouth; escalate per protocol.
Abusive head trauma (AHT), possible signs
The 2025 AAP technical report on abusive head trauma (AHT) in infants and children is the reference for recognition and evaluation. Neurologic change in a young child with an unexplained or non-matching history should prompt concern for AHT.
Treat as a possible injury; support airway, breathing and circulation and follow pediatric resuscitation guidance.
Fracture pattern
Fractures in a young child, particularly one who is not yet mobile or without a matching history, warrant evaluation for abuse. The 2014 AAP clinical report reviews fracture specificity and the evaluation.
Document and escalate; the child protection team arranges imaging per protocol.

Interpretation & Action Thresholds

Finding or ThresholdMeaningAction
Any TEN-4-FACESp element in a child with bruising
Positive screen; PPV 63.9% in validation at 19% abuse prevalence
Hands-on examination, undress, escalate to the child protection team per protocol
Any bruise in an infant 4.99 months or younger
Positive element at any site
Same as above; do not accept a single explanation without examination
No TEN-4-FACESp element, child with bruising
Negative screen; NPV 98.8% in validation at 19% abuse prevalence
Continue the assessment; reassess if the history or appearance changes
Injury that does not fit the history or development
Concern for inflicted injury regardless of the rule
Escalate per protocol; document the history verbatim
Neurologic change in a young child with an unexplained injury
Possible AHT
Immediate ABCDE; treat as a time-critical emergency

Limitations & Alternatives

  • Population: The rule was validated in children younger than 4 years with bruising, in five urban U.S. emergency departments, between 2011 and 2016. Results may not carry over to other settings or ages. It was validated in emergency departments only, so prehospital use is an extrapolation.
  • No true reference standard: A nine-member expert panel set abuse status by consensus. A second confirmatory exam of every screened child was not feasible.
  • Visibility: Skin tone changes how easily a bruise shows. The authors report that accuracy did not vary substantially across skin tones. Examine the whole skin, including the areas that are easy to miss.
  • Scope: The rule covers bruising in children younger than 4 years only. It does not reach older children. The sentinel-injury data and the AHT and fracture reports cover the other injury types.
Alternative or AdjunctUseLimitation
Child protection team (per local protocol)
Expert review of history, injuries and risk
Not always available prehospital; arranged by the receiving team
Skeletal survey and neuroimaging per local protocol
Evaluate fractures and suspected AHT
Hospital-based; ordered by the treating team
Full clinical history and examination
Required before any screen is applied
Time-limited; requires undressing the child

Pitfalls & Safety Checks

PitfallConsequencePrevention
Accepting a plausible history without examining the skin
Missed bruising and missed abuse
Undress and examine the whole child; apply the rule to every bruise
Treating a sentinel injury as trivial
Missed later serious abusive injury (0.7% in 12 months overall; 8.3% after an abuse diagnosis at the index visit)
Look for other injuries; follow the pathway; do not dismiss
Leading questions or accusing the caregiver
Contaminated history, harm to the child and family, and interference with the investigation
Ask open questions, write the answers verbatim, and leave judgment to the team
Applying the rule to a child with no bruising
False reassurance; the rule is not validated for that population
Use clinical judgment and the other signs on this page
Stopping at the bruise
Missed fracture or neurologic injury
Complete the examination and look for fractures and head injury
Assuming a normal exam excludes injury
Missed occult injury
Reassess and escalate when the history or appearance does not fit
Most dangerous error: Calling a bruise or minor injury benign in a non-mobile infant, or when the history does not match the injury. Examine the child. Record the history word for word. Escalate per protocol.

Special Populations

Infants (4.99 Months or Younger)

  • In this age group, any bruise at any site is a positive element of the TEN-4-FACESp rule.
  • In a non-mobile infant, check the mobility history against the mechanism described.

Young Children (Under 4 Years)

  • Bruises to the torso, ear, neck, frenulum, angle of jaw, cheek, eyelid or subconjunctiva are positive elements.
  • Use a child-friendly approach. The child may not be able to say that it hurts, or where.

Adolescents and Possible Exploitation

  • The AAP 2023 clinical report on exploitation, labor and sex trafficking sets out a trauma-informed, rights-based and culturally sensitive approach for health care providers.
  • This page does not list trafficking indicators. Learn them from the full report or your local protocol, then follow your agency pathway.
  • Victims may not see themselves as exploited. They may be reluctant to disclose. Ask about safety in private, where the child is willing, and follow local protocol.

Prehospital & Transport Considerations

EMS and transport clinicians are often the first to see the child, and often in the home, where the history is easiest to get. Your role: recognize, document, protect and hand off clearly. Scope and protocols vary by agency and state.

LevelTypical Role in This Topic
EMT
Documents the injury and the history verbatim; protects the child; reports per protocol
AEMT
Documents injuries and history verbatim; reports per protocol; provides supportive care
Paramedic
Performs the complete examination, escalates to the medical direction or child protection pathway per protocol
RN (ED or ICU)
Uses the rule at triage, documents, and involves the child protection team
Critical care transport
Maintains the child's safety en route, documents injuries and history, and gives a structured handoff
  • Scene: Keep the child somewhere safe. Take a private history in another area only when it can be done calmly and without escalation. Scene safety and law enforcement come first. Avoid arguing about cause.
  • Documentation: Record the history word for word, with who gave it and when. Describe each injury by site, size and colour, and mark a body diagram.
  • Reporting: Report under state law to child protective services or law enforcement, as your protocol directs. Do not investigate or delay care to do so.
  • Destination: A pediatric-capable emergency department. State the concern for abuse in the handoff, so the team can involve the child protection pathway.
  • Handoff: Give the injuries, the history as told, the positive screen elements and any neurologic change, in that order.
Reporting duties are set by state law. The federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act requires state reporting laws for known and suspected child abuse and neglect, and it grants immunity from civil or criminal liability for good-faith reports. Your state decides who must report, when the threshold is met and how fast. Check state law and agency policy.

Clinical Pearls

Bruising is the warning, not the verdict: Bruising is the injury most often missed before an abuse-related death or near-death in a young child, which is why the rule exists. Examine every bruise. Then let the rule decide whether a full evaluation is needed.
Small injuries carry a signal, but serious injury afterward is uncommon: Of 23,919 children aged 0 to 24 months with a sentinel-injury ED visit, 0.7% had a serious abusive injury within 12 months. Among the 1,156 whose abuse was diagnosed at that visit, the risk was 8.3%. The authors report that most children diagnosed with abuse in the study were found at the sentinel-injury visit. A minor injury in an infant is still a reason to look further.
A positive screen starts the work: The positive predictive value is 63.9% in a cohort where 19% of children had abuse. Many positives are not abuse. Your job is the examination and a team review. You do not reach a conclusion at the bedside.
Write down the words: The caregiver's exact account is evidence. A paraphrase cannot be checked later. Neither can your own conclusion in the chart.
Trauma-informed care protects the child: The AAP 2023 report advises a trauma-informed, rights-based approach for children who may have been exploited. A calm, open question is worth more than an accusation.

References

  1. Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Lorenz DJ, Bertocci G, Fingarson AK, Makoroff K, et al. Validation of a clinical decision rule to predict abuse in young children based on bruising characteristics. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e215832. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5832. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5832. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9):e2130136 (corrects Figure 2 key labels).
  2. Narang SK, Haney S, Duhaime AC, Martin J, Binenbaum G, de Alba Campomanes AG, et al; Council on Child Abuse and Neglect; Section on Ophthalmology; Section on Radiology; Section on Neurological Surgery; Society for Pediatric Radiology. Abusive head trauma in infants and children: technical report. Pediatrics. 2025;155(3):e2024070457. doi:10.1542/peds.2024-070457. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-070457
  3. Flaherty EG, Perez-Rossello JM, Levine MA, Hennrikus WL; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect; Section on Radiology; Section on Endocrinology; Section on Orthopaedics; Society for Pediatric Radiology. Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2014;133(2):e477-e489. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3793. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3793
  4. Greenbaum J, Kaplan D, Young J; Council on Child Abuse and Neglect; Council on Immigrant Child and Family Health. Exploitation, labor and sex trafficking of children and adolescents: health care needs of patients. Pediatrics. 2023;151(1):e2022060416. doi:10.1542/peds.2022-060416. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-060416
  5. Mitrano SM, Michelson KA, Monuteaux MC, Lindberg DM, Farrell CA, Li J. Sentinel injuries in emergency departments and subsequent serious injury in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2026;87(5):586-594. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.07.033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.07.033
  6. Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 USC § 5106a(b)(2)(B)(i) and (vii). State reporting provisions for known and suspected abuse, and good-faith immunity (clause (vii) amended by Pub. L. 115-424, 2019). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5106a

Last updated Spotted something wrong? Report an error and include the page URL.

Medical Disclaimer
  • For Educational Purposes Only: This content is intended for educational reference and should not be used for clinical decision-making.
  • Not a Substitute for Professional Judgment: Always consult your local protocols, institutional guidelines, and supervising physicians.
  • Verify Before Acting: Users are responsible for verifying information through authoritative sources before any clinical application.
AI Assistance Notice
AI was used to assist in organizing, paraphrasing, and formatting this information.